WEC12 Self-Mark Checklist — Master Document
Run This Before Submitting Any Answer to VERIDIAN
9 min read
VERIDIAN V6 Economics | Pearson Edexcel IAL WEC12/01
HOW TO USE THIS
Before every practice answer: Read the relevant section checklist. After every practice answer: Run through every box. Any unchecked box = a mark you left on the table. Before the real exam: Read the RAPID version (final section) once in the morning.
SECTION A — MCQ (6 marks)
- I answered all 6 questions — never left blank
- I checked each answer against the options before moving on
- I spent no more than 1 minute per question
- If uncertain: I made a best guess (no negative marking on WEC12)
SECTION B — 4-MARK QUESTIONS (20 marks)
For All Section B Questions:
- I identified the command word before writing (Explain / Draw / Calculate)
- I spent no more than 4 minutes on this question
- I stopped writing once the question's requirements were met
For Explain (4 marks):
- Knowledge statement present — concept accurately defined with economic terminology
- Application present — specific extract figure or context used (not just named)
- Stage 1 analysis present — immediate consequence of the mechanism
- Stage 2 analysis present — further consequence / macro significance
- No evaluation written anywhere in this answer
For Draw (4 marks):
- Y-axis labelled: "Price Level (P)" or appropriate axis label
- X-axis labelled: "Real GDP / Real Output" or appropriate axis label
- Original curve(s) labelled with subscript 1 (AD₁, SRAS₁, etc.)
- New curve(s) labelled with subscript 2 and directional arrow
- Original equilibrium: P₁ and Y₁ marked with dotted lines to both axes
- New equilibrium: P₂ and Y₂ marked with dotted lines to both axes
- If two shifts required: BOTH drawn (not just one)
- Diagram was ATTEMPTED — never left blank
For Calculate (4 marks):
- Formula written first in symbolic form
- Correct figures identified — correct variable, correct time period
- All working steps shown (method marks available even if final answer wrong)
- Final answer stated with correct units (%, £bn, etc.)
- Answer rounded appropriately (2 decimal places unless specified)
SECTION C Q12a — DEFINE (2 marks)
- Two genuinely distinct components given (not same idea restated)
- Both components are definitional — not examples, not causes, not consequences
- Formula included where the term is quantitative (multiplier, MPC, elasticity)
- No evaluation, analysis, or examples added after the two-part definition
- Answer is under 40 words
- Time taken: under 2 minutes
SECTION C Q12b — 4-MARK
(Same checklist as Section B 4-mark questions above)
SECTION C Q12c — 6-MARK ANALYSE
- Two distinct chains — not the same argument restated with different words
- Chain 1: knowledge statement with economic terminology (AO1)
- Chain 1: specific extract figure used and linked to mechanism — not copied (AO2)
- Chain 1: analytical chain reaches macroeconomic outcome (real GDP / unemployment / inflation / etc.) (AO3)
- Chain 2: knowledge statement (AO1)
- Chain 2: second specific extract figure or context used — not copied (AO2)
- Chain 2: analytical chain reaches macroeconomic outcome (AO3)
- No evaluation written anywhere in this answer
- No "however" / "it depends" / "this may not work" — these earn zero here
- Word count: approximately 100–130 words
- Time: under 8 minutes
SECTION C Q12d — 8-MARK EXAMINE
KAA section:
- Two complete KAA chains — same standard as 6-mark (K + specific data + macro outcome)
- Both chains reach macroeconomic significance
- Extract data embedded mid-chain in both (not just mentioned at the start)
- No evaluation mixed into the KAA chains
Evaluation section (AO4 — 2 marks only):
- One evaluation point present — specific economic reason for a limitation
- Condition stated: "only if / holds only when / provided that / depends on whether"
- Evaluation CHALLENGES the argument — does not reinforce or agree with it
- No bilateral argument (both sides) — that is 14-mark territory
- No conclusion / "overall therefore" written
- Word count: approximately 150–180 words
- Time: 10–11 minutes maximum
SECTION C Q12e — 14-MARK DISCUSS
KAA (8 marks):
- Two distinct mechanisms — genuinely different arguments, not the same one restated
- Chain 1: 3–4 stages from cause to macroeconomic significance
- Chain 1: specific extract data embedded mid-chain
- Chain 2: 3–4 stages from cause to macroeconomic significance
- Chain 2: specific extract data embedded mid-chain (different data from Chain 1)
- Both chains address the specific question — not a generic essay on the topic
Evaluation (6 marks):
- Evaluation 1: genuine challenge to Chain 1 — not additional support
- Evaluation 1: specific economic mechanism explaining the limitation
- Evaluation 1: condition stated ("only if / provided that")
- Evaluation 2: different evaluation move from Eval 1 — not the same point restated
- Evaluation 2: mechanism + condition
- Conditional judgement written in conclusion
- Conditional judgement contains "only if" or "provided that" or "depends on whether"
- Conditional judgement WEIGHS both arguments — identifies which is more significant
- Conditional judgement references extract data
- No unconditional "therefore [X] is effective" sentence anywhere
Overall:
- Word count: approximately 250–300 words
- Time: 14–17 minutes maximum
SECTION D Q13 — 20-MARK EVALUATE
Question selection (1 minute):
- Test 1 passed: I can name two distinct economic mechanisms for this question
- Test 2 passed: I have own-country data (specific country, specific figure, specific year)
- Test 3 passed: I can write a conditional judgement for this topic
- I chose the question and committed — I am not reconsidering mid-essay
Introduction:
- Key economic concept defined
- Debate identified — what are the two positions being weighed?
- Direction of argument signalled (optional but helps structure)
KAA Chain 1 (12 marks band):
- Economic mechanism stated with precision and correct terminology (K — AO1)
- Extract figure used and embedded mid-chain — not just mentioned in introduction (A — AO2)
- 4–5 analytical stages completed: cause → mechanism → first-order effect → second-order effect → macro significance (An — AO3)
- Own-country example with specific data and time period embedded (A — AO2)
- Chain reaches clear macroeconomic outcome
Evaluation 1:
- Genuinely CHALLENGES Chain 1 — does not reinforce it
- Specific economic mechanism explaining the limitation
- Condition stated: "only if / holds only when / provided that / depends on whether"
- Extract or country data referenced
KAA Chain 2:
- DISTINCT mechanism from Chain 1 — not the same argument with different words
- Same standard: K + extract data + own-country data + 4–5 stage chain + macro significance
Evaluation 2:
- DIFFERENT evaluation move from Eval 1
- Mechanism + condition
- Data referenced
Conditional Judgement — THE NON-NEGOTIABLE:
- Present — this MUST be written even if running behind on time
- Contains "only if" or "provided that" or "depends on whether"
- WEIGHS both chains — identifies which is more significant
- States the CONDITION that determines which argument prevails
- References SPECIFIC DATA from extract or own-country examples
- Makes a DECISIVE final statement or recommendation
- States what happens if the condition is not met (counter-condition)
- No unconditional conclusion anywhere in the essay
Overall:
- Word count: approximately 450–550 words
- Time: 28 minutes maximum
- Diagram drawn if applicable (only if fully labelable in under 90 seconds)
THE RAPID PRE-EXAM CHECKLIST — READ ON EXAM MORNING
Print this section and read it once before entering the exam hall.
from A:*
- Every conclusion contains "only if [condition]" — no exceptions
- Every analytical chain reaches a macroeconomic outcome (real GDP / unemployment / inflation / current account / fiscal position)
- Own-country data in the 20-mark essay has: specific country + specific figure + specific year
The three things that cost marks unnecessarily:
- Evaluation in a 6-mark Analyse question — earns zero, wastes 2 minutes
- Leaving a Draw question blank — always attempt it; partial marks > zero
- Running over time on Q12e — protect 28 minutes for the 20-mark essay regardless
The conditional judgement sentence to write in every conclusion: "Overall, [X] is the more significant [effect/policy/factor], but only if [condition]. In the context of [extract economy], [specific data] suggests [condition is/is not met], meaning [decisive outcome]."
If you run out of time during the 20-marker: Write the conditional judgement immediately. Even without the full body, the judgement alone earns 2 evaluation marks.
ERROR LOG — TRACK YOUR PATTERNS
After every practice paper, log errors here:
| Error type | Occurrences this paper | Running total | T or K? |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHAIN-SHORT (stopped before macro outcome) | T | ||
| UNCONDITIONAL (conclusion without "only if") | T | ||
| GENERIC-EVAL (evaluation without mechanism) | T | ||
| NO-DATA (application without extract figure) | T | ||
| COPIES-EXTRACT (data stated, not used) | T | ||
| EVAL-IN-ANALYSE (evaluation on 6-mark) | T | ||
| BLANK-DIAGRAM (Draw question left empty) | T | ||
| OWN-COUNTRY-ABSENT (no country data in essay) | T | ||
| WRONG-FORMULA (calculation error) | K | ||
| WRONG-AXIS (diagram mislabelled) | T | ||
| VOCAB-IMPRECISE | K |
If any error type appears 3+ times across papers: This is your priority drill focus. Dedicate 15 minutes specifically to that error type before the next practice session.
VERIDIAN V6 Economics | WEC12 Self-Mark Checklist | Pearson Edexcel IAL Unit 2
Up next
WEC12 Topic Bank
Every Examinable Topic — Frequency, Position, Chains, Diagrams
38 min