Choosing Where to Focus

Reading the score distribution to decide how to split your week

3 min read

This lesson teaches the comparison pattern the scoring model produces, not a specific historical batch of leads — the course does not reproduce lead counts or any other detail from the two real, dated lead lists the original build worked from.


1. The two plays, restated as what the score actually measures

Module 1 introduced the volume play and the value play as a strategic choice. Now that you've seen the scoring model, you can see why they show up as genuinely different distributions rather than just two labels for the same thing:

  • Volume-play categories (barbers, nail salons, food trucks, solo trades) are capped on the VALUE term — 12–18 points, versus up to 30 for a high-value category — no matter how strong their PAIN signal is. A Facebook-only barber shop with a great local number can score well, but the VALUE ceiling means it rarely clears deep into A-grade territory. Expect this category to cluster in the B band: strong enough for the full call-email-SMS sequence, not usually strong enough to jump the queue ahead of everything else.
  • Value-play categories (dentists, and the same logic for any licensed professional practice) carry VALUE up to 30, and because these practices are more likely to have an outdated real site than no site at all, they also tend to hit the highest PAIN tier (32, for an outdated site — genuinely higher than the "no site" score of 28–30). High PAIN and high VALUE together push this category disproportionately into the A band.

That's the whole mechanism behind "the value play produces higher-quality leads by the score, even though it converts more slowly." It isn't a subjective impression — it falls straight out of how the VALUE term is weighted per category.

2. What each play is actually good for

Volume playValue play
Typical deal$997 + $97/mo$1,500–3,000 + $150–300/mo
Where it clusters on the scoreMostly B-grade — high pain, value-cappedMostly A-grade — high pain and high value
AccessOwner usually answers directlyGatekeeper almost always answers first — Module 5 is built for this
Best forCash this week; more, faster, easier closesBigger, stickier deals; fewer swings, bigger hits

3. The actual recommendation

Run the volume play for cash flow now, and work a handful of your top A-grade value-play leads in parallel for the upside. Don't choose one exclusively — a first month built entirely on volume-play leads produces fast small wins but caps your average deal size for months; a first month built entirely on value-play leads is slower to produce any cash at all while you're still learning the script (Module 1's ramp curve applies with extra force here, since gatekeeper access adds a whole additional funnel stage before you even reach a decision-maker).

When you sort your own scored list, call in this order regardless of which play a lead belongs to: every A-grade lead first, across both categories, then work down through B. The score already encodes the value-versus-pain tradeoff between the two plays — you don't need a separate manual triage step on top of it.

4. Sizing your own list

There's no fixed target list size this course can hand you honestly — it depends entirely on your city, your category choices, and how many towns or ZIP codes you split your search across (Module 3's sourcing lesson, §3). What matters isn't the count, it's the shape: after scoring, you want enough A-grade leads to fill your first week of demo-building, and a much larger B-grade pool behind them to keep you dialing once the A-grade list runs out. If your first scored batch comes back with almost no A-grades in it, that's a signal to widen the category or town list before you start calling, not a signal to lower your standards on what counts as an A.

WAW · progress saved in this browser · sign in to sync across devices

Up next

The Psychology Behind the Script

Ten principles, and where each one shows up in the actual words you'll say

3 min