Harmonic Form: Writing a cos t + b sin t as R cos(t ± a)

~50 min · WMA13 · 2.3

WMA13 · 2.3 · 50 min

Every sum acosθ+bsinθa\cos\theta + b\sin\theta is one wave wearing a disguise — Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta \mp \alpha) — and finding RR and α\alpha is what turns an equation with two tangled trig terms into one you already know how to solve.

Key terms in this lesson

Before you read on

Two or three questions on exactly what this lesson teaches. Being wrong here is fine — it's the fastest way to find out what to pay attention to next.

What you already have on the formula sheet — and what you don't

This lesson leans on one identity from the compound-angle work: cos(AB)cosAcosB±sinAsinB\cos(A \mp B) \equiv \cos A\cos B \pm \sin A\sin B and sin(A±B)sinAcosB±cosAsinB\sin(A \pm B) \equiv \sin A\cos B \pm \cos A\sin B (spec 2.3). Both of these, together with tan(A±B)\tan(A \pm B), are printed in the *Mathematical Formulae and Statistical Tables* booklet supplied in the exam, so their exact form never needs to be memorised. What isn't printed — and is the entire content of this lesson — is what to build out of them.

The same spec point, 2.3, also covers the double-angle formulae sin2A\sin 2A, cos2A\cos 2A and tan2A\tan 2A: the compound-angle formulae applied with A=BA = B. Unlike the sum-and-difference formulae above, these are NOT printed in the booklet and do need to be memorised outright — but deriving and drilling them is the prerequisite lesson's job, not this one's. This lesson assumes you can expand cos(θα)\cos(\theta \mp \alpha) correctly on demand and takes it from there.

Why bother rewriting a cosine and a sine as one term

3cosθ+4sinθ3\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta has two trig terms in it, at the same angle θ\theta but different functions, and no single-angle identity applies to an expression shaped like that. Ask two ordinary questions about it — what is its largest possible value, and for which θ\theta does 3cosθ+4sinθ=23\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta = 2 — and there is no direct route to either answer while it stays in this form. Both become easy the moment it is rewritten as a single wave: one cosine, one coefficient out front, one phase shift. That rewriting is the whole of this lesson.

The claim that acosθ+bsinθa\cos\theta + b\sin\theta IS a single wave is worth sitting with before deriving it, because it isn't obvious on sight: two different sinusoids of the same frequency, added together, always produce a third sinusoid of that same frequency — never a more complicated shape, never two humps where one is expected. Spec 2.3's own guidance names the two payoffs directly: solving equations of the form acosθ+bsinθ=ca\cos\theta + b\sin\theta = c in a given interval, and — its natural partner, tested directly in real papers such as Oct 2020 Q7 — reading off a maximum or minimum value with no calculus at all.

Why 3cosθ + 4sinθ collapses to one wave — the 3-4-5 triangle first

In plain terms

Look at just the two numbers in front of cosθ and sinθ: 3 and 4, nothing else yet. Draw a right-angled triangle with one short side 3 units long and the other short side 4 units long. Pythagoras gives the third side: 32+42=9+16=253^2 + 4^2 = 9 + 16 = 25, and 25=5\sqrt{25} = 5 — the hypotenuse is exactly 5 (this is the famous 3-4-5 triangle; 3, 4 and 5 aren't a coincidence chosen to make the numbers come out clean). Inside that triangle sits an angle, next to the side of length 3, whose cosine is 35=0.6\frac{3}{5} = 0.6 and whose sine is 45=0.8\frac{4}{5} = 0.8. A calculator turns cos1(0.6)\cos^{-1}(0.6) into 53.13° — a real angle, found from a triangle and a calculator, no algebra involved. Now test three values of θ directly in 3cosθ+4sinθ3\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta: at θ=0°\theta = 0°, it's 3(1)+4(0)=33(1) + 4(0) = 3; at θ=90°\theta = 90°, it's 3(0)+4(1)=43(0) + 4(1) = 4; at θ=53.13°\theta = 53.13° — the angle the triangle just handed over — it's 3(0.6)+4(0.8)=1.8+3.2=53(0.6) + 4(0.8) = 1.8 + 3.2 = 5, bigger than either of the first two, and exactly the hypotenuse. Try θ=30°\theta = 30° for contrast: 3(0.866)+4(0.5)=2.60+2.0=4.603(0.866) + 4(0.5) = 2.60 + 2.0 = 4.60 — smaller again. 5 is the ceiling, and 53.13° is exactly where 3cosθ+4sinθ3\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta touches it — every number in that sentence, 3, 4, 5, 0.6, 0.8, 53.13°, came out of one triangle.

Name what the triangle just supplied. The hypotenuse — 5 — is what becomes R once the same method is written for any pair of numbers instead of just 3 and 4: it's the wave's amplitude, its own maximum height, and it always comes from that same Pythagoras step, (first number)² + (second number)² = R². The angle the triangle handed over — 53.13°, found from cos1(0.6)\cos^{-1}(0.6) — is what becomes α: the phase shift, how far the wave has slid sideways, and it always comes from that same ratio step, cosα=aR\cos\alpha = \frac{a}{R} and sinα=bR\sin\alpha = \frac{b}{R}, read off a calculator. Once R and α have names, 3cosθ+4sinθ5cos(θ53.13°)3\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta \equiv 5\cos(\theta - 53.13°) isn't a new fact to learn — it's the same triangle, restated as something true for every θ, not just the four tried above.

Formally

For any a>0a > 0 and b>0b > 0, acosθ+bsinθRcos(θα)a\cos\theta + b\sin\theta \equiv R\cos(\theta - \alpha), where R=a2+b2R = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2} and α=arctan(ba)\alpha = \arctan\left(\frac{b}{a}\right) with 0°<α<90°0° < \alpha < 90°. R comes from Pythagoras on the two coefficients, exactly as it came from Pythagoras on 3 and 4 above; α comes from the same ratio, cosα=aR\cos\alpha = \frac{a}{R} and sinα=bR\sin\alpha = \frac{b}{R}. The full matching-coefficients derivation — where this identity comes from, not just what it states — follows immediately below.

Mechanism

Deriving R and α — matching coefficients, not memorising a formula

Take the target directly: write acosθ+bsinθRcos(θα)a\cos\theta + b\sin\theta \equiv R\cos(\theta - \alpha) for some R>0R > 0 and α\alpha still to be found, and expand the right-hand side using the recapped above: Rcos(θα)=Rcosθcosα+Rsinθsinα=(Rcosα)cosθ+(Rsinα)sinθR\cos(\theta - \alpha) = R\cos\theta\cos\alpha + R\sin\theta\sin\alpha = (R\cos\alpha)\cos\theta + (R\sin\alpha)\sin\theta. This has to equal acosθ+bsinθa\cos\theta + b\sin\theta for every value of θ\theta, which is only possible if the two expressions have the same coefficient of cosθ\cos\theta and the same coefficient of sinθ\sin\theta separately — an identity, not an equation to solve for one value of θ\theta. That gives two simultaneous equations in RR and α\alpha: Rcosα=aR\cos\alpha = a and Rsinα=bR\sin\alpha = b. Square both and add: R2cos2α+R2sin2α=a2+b2R^2\cos^2\alpha + R^2\sin^2\alpha = a^2 + b^2, and since cos2α+sin2α1\cos^2\alpha + \sin^2\alpha \equiv 1 (memorised, not on the sheet), the left side collapses to R2R^2 — so R=a2+b2R = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}, taking the positive root because R>0R > 0 was fixed as a condition from the start. Divide instead of adding: RsinαRcosα=ba\frac{R\sin\alpha}{R\cos\alpha} = \frac{b}{a}, so tanα=ba\tan\alpha = \frac{b}{a}, giving α=arctan(ba)\alpha = \arctan\left(\frac{b}{a}\right) once a quadrant is chosen. Nothing here is a new formula to learn — Rcosα=aR\cos\alpha = a and Rsinα=bR\sin\alpha = b are exactly the Pythagoras-and-tangent pair used to convert between a point (a,b)(a, b) and its distance-and-angle description, applied to the two coefficients rather than to a point on a graph.

Diagram — R cos(θ − α): the same cosine wave, stretched and slid
θ (degrees)yC1 · y = cos θC2 · y = R cos(θ − α)Maximum (α, R)Minimum (α + 180°, −R)

x-axis: θ (degrees) · y-axis: y

C1 · y = cos θ
The ordinary cosine curve, amplitude 1, reaching its maximum value of 1 at θ = 0°.
C2 · y = R cos(θ − α)
The same cosine shape, stretched vertically by a factor of R and slid RIGHT by α degrees — subtracting α inside the bracket delays the curve, so the value the plain cosine curve reached at θ = 0 is now reached only once θ has advanced to α. Its maximum is R, not 1, and it occurs at θ = α, not θ = 0. Plotted here with the lesson's own worked values, R = 5 and α = 53.1° (1 d.p.), from 3cosθ + 4sinθ ≡ 5cos(θ − 53.1°) (the 3-4-5 triangle worked in the concept ladder above and reused in the marked-solution block).
Maximum (α, R)
cos of anything is at most 1, so R cos(θ−α) is at most R, and that ceiling is reached exactly when θ−α = 0, i.e. θ = α. This one fact answers every 'find the maximum and where it occurs' question on this topic with no further working.
Minimum (α + 180°, −R)
cos is at its most negative, −1, half a turn later. R cos(θ−α) mirrors that at θ = α + 180°, where its value is −R.
Two crossings of any horizontal line strictly between −R and R
A line y = k with −R < k < R cuts one period of the curve at exactly two points, symmetric about the peak at θ = α — the geometric picture behind the 'two solutions' fact tested in the prequestion, and the mark most often lost in practice.

Common error: Reading the phase shift the wrong way — treating R cos(θ − α) as shifted LEFT by α because α is 'being subtracted'.

Correct: Subtracting inside the bracket shifts the graph RIGHT: y = f(θ − α) reaches at θ the value f used to reach at θ − α, i.e. every value arrives α degrees LATER. It is the same rule that shifts y = (x − 2)² right, not left.

Mechanism

Which of the four forms — and why the signs of a and b decide it

The spec names both functions and both signs: R cos(θ − α), R cos(θ + α), R sin(θ − α) and R sin(θ + α) are all valid targets, and the question in front of you (or your own choice, when it isn't specified) decides which one to build. The choice isn't arbitrary once you see what breaks it: whichever form is used, matching coefficients produces two equations for R with cosα and R with sinα, and both of those have to come out POSITIVE for an α strictly between 0° and 90° to exist. For a cosθ + b sinθ with a > 0 and b > 0, the cos(θ − α) form gives Rcosα = a and Rsinα = b — both positive, so it fits directly. Flip the sign of b, so a > 0 and b < 0 — as in 7cosθ − 24sinθ, worked in full below — and that same form would need Rsinα = b < 0, impossible for a first-quadrant α; switch to cos(θ + α) instead, which expands to Rcosθcosα − Rsinθsinα, giving Rcosα = a and Rsinα = −b, both positive again. The sin-led forms follow the identical logic with the two matching equations swapped: R sin(θ + α) expands to Rsinθcosα + Rcosθsinα, so it is the coefficient of cosθ that matches Rsinα and the coefficient of sinθ that matches Rcosα — worked in full in the chain-drill below, where 8cosθ + 15sinθ is built into that shape. There is no need to memorise all four sign patterns as separate rules: derive the one you need, on the spot, the same way each time — expand the target, compare coefficients, and check that both matching values come out positive before trusting the α you get.

Worked, in full

The full method for 7cosθ − 24sinθ = −15, 0° ≤ θ < 360°, expressed first as R cos(θ + α)

  1. 01

    Read the coefficients before choosing a form. a=7>0a = 7 > 0 and b=24<0b = -24 < 0, so — by the sign rule above — Rcos(θ+α)R\cos(\theta+\alpha) is the shape that keeps both matching values positive, not Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta-\alpha).

    Earns: M1 — attempts to expand R cos(θ+α) = Rcosθcosα − Rsinθsinα and compare coefficients with 7cosθ − 24sinθ, i.e. Rcosα = 7 and −Rsinα = −24 (so Rsinα = 24). The mark is for the correct structure; the values come next.

  2. 02

    Square and add: R2=72+242=49+576=625R^2 = 7^2 + 24^2 = 49 + 576 = 625, so R=25R = 25 (the positive root).

    Earns: A1 — R = 25, dependent on the method mark above; a Pythagorean triple, checkable by inspection before continuing.

  3. 03

    Divide the two matching equations: tanα=247\tan\alpha = \frac{24}{7}, so α=73.7°\alpha = 73.7° (1 d.p.).

    Earns: A1 — α = 73.7° (awrt), the value in the required range 0° < α < 90° since both Rcosα and Rsinα came out positive at stage 1.

  4. 04

    Substitute into the original equation: 7cosθ24sinθ=157\cos\theta - 24\sin\theta = -15 becomes 25cos(θ+73.7°)=1525\cos(\theta + 73.7°) = -15, so cos(θ+73.7°)=0.6\cos(\theta + 73.7°) = -0.6.

    Earns: M1 — substitutes their R and α into the given equation and rearranges to isolate cos(θ+α) — the entire reason the expansion was done first.

  5. 05

    Solve for the bracket, keeping both branches: cos1(0.6)=126.9°\cos^{-1}(-0.6) = 126.9° (1 d.p.), so θ+73.7°=126.9°\theta + 73.7° = 126.9° or θ+73.7°=126.9°\theta + 73.7° = -126.9°.

    Earns: dM1 — solves cos(θ+α) = −0.6 for θ+α using ±cos⁻¹(value) + 360n, dependent on reaching a numeric value for the bracket at stage 4.

  6. 06

    Subtract 73.7° to recover θ, and bring both values into range: θ=53.1°\theta = 53.1°, and θ=126.9°73.7°=200.6°\theta = -126.9° - 73.7° = -200.6°, which becomes θ=159.4°\theta = 159.4° after adding 360°360°.

    Earns: A1 — both values of θ correct to 1 d.p. Converting the shifted angle (θ+α) back into θ is the step skipped most often; the mark is specifically for doing it on both branches, not just the first.

Source — Question paper, Jan 2023

"In this question you must show all stages of your working. Solutions relying entirely on calculator technology are not acceptable."

Complete it yourself

Complete the chain — express 8cosθ + 15sinθ in the form R sin(θ + α), 0 < α < 90°, and hence find its maximum value

  1. 01

    Expand the target using the for sine: Rsin(θ+α)Rsinθcosα+RcosθsinαR\sin(\theta+\alpha) \equiv R\sin\theta\cos\alpha + R\cos\theta\sin\alpha. Compare with 8cosθ+15sinθ8\cos\theta + 15\sin\theta: the coefficient of cosθ\cos\theta matches RsinαR\sin\alpha, and the coefficient of sinθ\sin\theta matches RcosαR\cos\alpha — the two trig functions swap roles compared with the cosine-led form, because it is sinθ\sin\theta, not cosθ\cos\theta, that stands alone in this expansion.

  2. 02

    So Rsinα=8R\sin\alpha = 8 and Rcosα=15R\cos\alpha = 15. Both are positive, which is exactly what makes an α\alpha in (0°,90°)(0°, 90°) available — the same sign check as the cosine-led form, just with the two equations swapped round.

Marked, line by line

g(θ)=3cosθ+4sinθg(\theta) = 3\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta, for 0°θ<360°0° \leq \theta < 360°. (a) Express g(θ)g(\theta) in the form Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta - \alpha), where R>0R > 0 and 0<α<90°0 < \alpha < 90°, giving the value of α\alpha to 1 decimal place. (3) (b) Hence write down the maximum value of g(θ)g(\theta) and the smallest non-negative value of θ\theta at which it occurs. (2) (c) Hence solve the equation 3cosθ+4sinθ=23\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta = 2 for 0°θ<360°0° \leq \theta < 360°, giving your answers to 1 decimal place. (3) — VERIDIAN-original question, inspired by the structure of real WMA13 items that pair a harmonic-form 'express' part with a 'hence' maximum/minimum part and a 'hence solve' part (spec 2.3). Not a reproduction of any past-paper question, and the per-line mark allocations below are modelled on verified mark-scheme conventions rather than copied from a real scheme, which for an original question does not exist.

8 marks available

(a)3 marks

  1. 01

    Rcos(θα)Rcosθcosα+RsinθsinαR\cos(\theta-\alpha) \equiv R\cos\theta\cos\alpha + R\sin\theta\sin\alpha, so comparing with 3cosθ+4sinθ3\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta: Rcosα=3R\cos\alpha = 3 and Rsinα=4R\sin\alpha = 4.

    Method mark for expanding the target form and comparing coefficients of cosθ and sinθ. Quoting the expansion before substituting is the same protective habit the general marking guidance names for any learnt formula: quoted first, the method mark survives even if a later line slips; left implicit, it has to be inferred from correct working and can be lost to any mistake in it.

    M1
  2. 02

    R=32+42=25=5R = \sqrt{3^2 + 4^2} = \sqrt{25} = 5.

    Accuracy mark for R, dependent on the method mark above, found from squaring and adding the two matching equations and using cos²α + sin²α ≡ 1.

    A1
  3. 03

    tanα=43\tan\alpha = \frac{4}{3}, so α=53.1°\alpha = 53.1° (1 d.p.).

    Accuracy mark for α to the stated precision (awrt 53.1°), dependent on the method mark. Both Rcosα and Rsinα came out positive above, confirming α does lie in the required 0° < α < 90° range.

    A1

(b)2 marks

  1. 101

    cos of anything is at most 1, so 5cos(θ53.1°)5\cos(\theta - 53.1°) is at most 55; the maximum value of g(θ)g(\theta) is 55.

    Independent mark, follow through their R from part (a). Needs no method beyond the range of cosine — exactly why the three marks spent building the harmonic form in part (a) pay off here.

    B1 ft
  2. 102

    The maximum is reached when θ53.1°=0\theta - 53.1° = 0, i.e. at θ=53.1°\theta = 53.1°.

    Independent mark, follow through their α. The smallest non-negative θ at which the maximum occurs is α itself, read straight off the shifted graph — no extra solving needed.

    B1 ft

(c)3 marks

  1. 201

    3cosθ+4sinθ=23\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta = 2 becomes 5cos(θ53.1°)=25\cos(\theta - 53.1°) = 2, so cos(θ53.1°)=0.4\cos(\theta - 53.1°) = 0.4.

    Method mark for substituting the harmonic form from part (a) into the equation and isolating cos(θ−α) — the entire reason part (a) was asked before part (c).

    M1
  2. 202

    cos1(0.4)=66.4°\cos^{-1}(0.4) = 66.4° (1 d.p.), so θ53.1°=66.4°\theta - 53.1° = 66.4°, giving θ=119.6°\theta = 119.6°.

    Accuracy mark for the first solution, dependent on the method mark, from the positive branch of cos⁻¹(0.4).

    A1
  3. 203

    θ53.1°=66.4°\theta - 53.1° = -66.4° gives θ=13.3°\theta = -13.3°, out of range; adding 360°360° gives θ=346.7°\theta = 346.7°.

    Accuracy mark for the second solution. Cosine is two-to-one over a full turn, so cos(θ−α) = 0.4 has two solutions for θ−α within a 360° sweep, and both have to be converted back into the stated range — the single mark lost most often on this exact question shape (see the trap taxonomy below).

    A1

In your own words

In one sentence: why does converting acosθ+bsinθa\cos\theta + b\sin\theta into Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta - \alpha) turn a 'how many solutions, and where' question into one you can just read off, when the original two-term form couldn't?

Named traps

missing-second-solution-in-range
Confirmed verbatim on a real "solve in a given range" trig question: "It was disappointing that many candidates failed to identify the second solution here to gain the full marks" (Jun 2022, Q7). Cosine (and sine) are two-to-one over a full 360° turn for any target value strictly between −1 and 1, so an equation of the form cos(θ−α) = k always has a second solution in a 360° interval — finding the first one algebraically correctly is not the same as finding the answer.
degrees-radians-mismatch
A documented pattern across five separate series (Oct 2020, Jan 2022, Jun 2022, Jun 2023, Jan 2024): candidates lose the final accuracy mark on a 'solve in a given range' trig equation by giving the answer in degrees when the question specified radians, or vice versa. The interval itself is the tell — 0° ≤ θ < 360° wants degrees, 0 ≤ θ < 2π wants radians — and it is worth checking that match before writing a single answer down, not after.
exact-R-decimal-rounded-or-alpha-given-in-wrong-angle-unit
This trap sits earlier than the one above — on the R and α accuracy marks THEMSELVES, while building the harmonic form, not on the final solved θ. A real WMA13 harmonic-form question can specify both a required FORM for R (exact, not decimal) and a required UNIT for α (radians, not degrees), and a numerically correct value in the wrong form or unit earns nothing on that mark. Confirmed verbatim on a real question testing exactly this spec point, Oct 2020 Q7(a): "Express cos x + 4 sin x in the form R cos(x − α) where R > 0 and 0 < α < π/2. Give the exact value of R and give the value of α, in radians, to 3 decimal places." The real mark scheme is explicit on both counts. For R = √17: "Condone R = ±√17 (Do not allow decimals for this mark...)" — a correct decimal such as 4.123 scores zero on that mark, because the question asked for the EXACT value, and √17 is not the same answer as its rounded decimal for marking purposes. For α = awrt 1.326: "Note that the degree equivalent α = awrt 75.96° is A0" — the identical angle, correctly computed, in the wrong unit, still earns nothing. Read the question’s own instructions on form and unit before writing R and α down, not after computing them the way that feels automatic.
extra-out-of-range-solutions-kept
The same five-series pattern's third face: including a solution generated by the ±360n general form that actually falls outside the stated interval once it is written out. Generating θ = α ± cos⁻¹(k) + 360n is the right method; the last step — checking every value produced against the stated bounds before it goes in the answer — is not optional bookkeeping, it is the mark.
stops-after-the-shifted-angle-never-recovers-theta
The specific error this lesson's marked solution builds around — solving for (θ−α) or (θ+α) and reporting that as if it answered the question — is one instance of a broader, independently documented failure: stopping at an intermediate variable instead of converting back to the one actually asked about. A different WMA13 equation type shows the identical pattern one layer earlier, at the point of substitution rather than shifting: "A few interpreted the solution to their equation as being the value for x rather than for sin x, thereby losing both marks" (Jan 2024, Q6(c)). Different equation, same discipline missing: know which variable you have just solved for, and know which one the question asked for.
minimising-the-original-expression-confused-with-minimising-the-wave
When a harmonic-form term sits inside a denominator (or is being subtracted from something), minimising the WHOLE expression can require MAXIMISING the wave, not minimising it — the two optimisations point in opposite directions. Confirmed directly on a real paper, where a fraction of the shape (constant)/(constant + wave) had to be minimised: "this did cause some confusion for many in that they did not realise that for the fraction to be a minimum the denominator had to be a maximum" (Oct 2020, Q7). Before optimising anything built out of R cos(θ−α), ask explicitly which direction — max or min of the WAVE — actually produces the extreme of the thing the question asked about.
incomplete-working-on-a-prove-that-identity
Spec 2.3's own guidance names an example identity students should be able to prove — "cos x cos 2x + sin x sin 2x ≡ cos x" — and identity proofs of this kind are marked on the presence of every intermediate line, not just a correct method plus a correct final line. Confirmed, a general summary from a real series: "many candidates omitted important lines when proceeding to the given solution resulting in the loss of some vital marks" (Jan 2022). On a 'show that' or 'prove' instruction, the compound-angle expansion line itself is not optional working to skip past — it is one of the lines being marked.

Retrieval — with feedback on every choice

Question 1
3 marks

Express 5cosθ12sinθ5\cos\theta - 12\sin\theta in the form Rcos(θ+α)R\cos(\theta + \alpha), where R>0R > 0 and 0<α<90°0 < \alpha < 90°. What is α\alpha to 1 decimal place?

Question 2
3 marks

What is the maximum value of 7cosθ+24sinθ7\cos\theta + 24\sin\theta, and at what value of θ\theta in [0°,360°)[0°, 360°) does it occur (to 1 d.p.)?

Question 3
4 marks

The equation 2cosθ+5sinθ=42\cos\theta + 5\sin\theta = 4 is to be solved for θ\theta in 0°θ<360°0° \leq \theta < 360°, after writing the left side as Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta - \alpha). Which statement about the solutions is correct?

Question 4
2 marks

For acosθ+bsinθa\cos\theta + b\sin\theta with a>0a > 0 and b<0b < 0, which form keeps R>0R > 0 and 0<α<90°0 < \alpha < 90°?

Question 5
3 marks

In this question you must show all stages of your working. Solutions relying entirely on calculator technology are not acceptable. Express 3cosθ+4sinθ3\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta in the form Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta - \alpha) and hence solve 3cosθ+4sinθ=23\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta = 2 for 0°θ<360°0° \leq \theta < 360°.

Which response is certain to earn full marks under the printed instruction above?

Question 6
1 mark

In part (a) you meant to write α = 53.1° but transposed the digits and wrote 51.3°. Part (b) says 'hence' state the maximum value of g(θ)g(\theta) and where it occurs. What is the best thing to do?

Question 7
3 marks

A real WMA13 question of this exact type (Oct 2020, Q7(a)) reads: 'Express cos x + 4 sin x in the form R cos(x − α) where R > 0 and 0 < α < π/2. Give the exact value of R and give the value of α, in radians, to 3 decimal places.' Its real mark scheme awards B1 for R = √17 with the note 'do not allow decimals for this mark', and states for α = awrt 1.326 that 'the degree equivalent α = awrt 75.96° is A0' — the same angle, in the wrong unit.

Applying that same real mark scheme's rules: 2cosθ+3sinθ2\cos\theta + 3\sin\theta is written as Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta-\alpha), with R>0R>0 and 0<α<π20 < \alpha < \frac{\pi}{2}, and the question asks for the EXACT value of RR and the value of α\alpha in RADIANS to 3 decimal places. Which pair earns full marks?

Reference — not a study method, a lookup
  • a cosθ + b sinθ ≡ R cos(θ∓α): expand, compare coefficients, then R = √(a²+b²), tanα = b/a (or a/b for a sin-led form).
  • Signs pick the form: a,b both + → cos(θ−α); a+ b− → cos(θ+α). Check Rcosα and Rsinα both come out positive.
  • Max value R at θ=α (cos-led) or where the argument is 90° (sin-led); min value −R half a turn later.
  • cos(θ−α)=k, −R<k<R, always has TWO solutions in a 360° sweep — find both, then convert back to θ.
  • Give exactly what's asked: if the question wants the exact value of R, a decimal loses that mark even if correct; if it wants α in radians, degrees loses that mark too, same angle or not.
  • Not on the formula sheet: build it fresh from cos(A∓B), which is.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson Edexcel. Every quotation and figure attributed to a mark scheme or examiner report in this lesson was independently verified against the primary Pearson document, not carried over from prior course material. Every question in this lesson — prequestion, worked chain, chain drill, marked solution and MCQ alike — is VERIDIAN-original wording, inspired by confirmed real question types, never a reproduction of a real Pearson question; and because the questions are original, the per-line mark allocations attached to them are modelled on verified mark-scheme conventions (what M, A and B marks mean, when follow-through applies, when a mark is dependent on a prior method mark) rather than transcribed from a real mark scheme, which for an original question does not exist.

Question 13 marks

Express 5cosθ12sinθ5\cos\theta - 12\sin\theta in the form Rcos(θ+α)R\cos(\theta + \alpha), where R>0R > 0 and 0<α<90°0 < \alpha < 90°. What is α\alpha to 1 decimal place?

  • 67.4°67.4°

    Correct. Rcos(θ+α)=RcosθcosαRsinθsinαR\cos(\theta+\alpha) = R\cos\theta\cos\alpha - R\sin\theta\sin\alpha, so Rcosα=5R\cos\alpha = 5 and Rsinα=12R\sin\alpha = 12; tanα=125\tan\alpha = \frac{12}{5}, giving α=67.4°\alpha = 67.4°. (R=52+122=13R = \sqrt{5^2+12^2} = 13.)

  • B22.6°22.6°

    This comes from tanα=512\tan\alpha = \frac{5}{12} — the ratio inverted. It's RsinαRcosα=ba\frac{R\sin\alpha}{R\cos\alpha} = \frac{b}{a}, always the sinθ-coefficient over the cosθ-coefficient for a cos-led form, never the other way round.

  • C67.4°-67.4°

    The magnitude is right and the sign convention isn't followed: the question fixes 0<α<90°0 < \alpha < 90°, and both Rcosα=5R\cos\alpha = 5 and Rsinα=12R\sin\alpha = 12 came out positive, which places α in the first quadrant, not as a negative angle.

  • D112.6°112.6°

    This is 180°67.4°180° - 67.4°, the supplementary angle — a habit worth having when solving a trig EQUATION, but wrong here: this question is building an IDENTITY, and 0<α<90°0 < \alpha < 90° was fixed by the question. A supplementary angle would make Rcosα negative, contradicting Rcosα = 5.

Traps tested: Tan ratio inverted · Negative alpha not converted to range · Supplementary angle used instead of reference angle

Question 23 marks

What is the maximum value of 7cosθ+24sinθ7\cos\theta + 24\sin\theta, and at what value of θ\theta in [0°,360°)[0°, 360°) does it occur (to 1 d.p.)?

  • 2525, at θ=73.7°\theta = 73.7°

    Correct. 7cosθ+24sinθ=25cos(θ73.7°)7\cos\theta + 24\sin\theta = 25\cos(\theta - 73.7°) (R = √(7²+24²) = 25, tanα = 24/7). The maximum of a cos-led form R cos(θ−α) is R, at θ = α.

  • B2525, at θ=0°\theta = 0°

    R is right, but the phase shift has been ignored — the maximum of plain cosθ is at θ=0, but R cos(θ−α) is plain cosine SHIFTED by α, so its maximum moves to θ=α along with it.

  • C3131, at θ=73.7°\theta = 73.7°

    R has been computed as 7 + 24 = 31, not 72+242\sqrt{7^2+24^2}. The two coefficients combine by Pythagoras, since they are R cosα and R sinα — legs of a right triangle with hypotenuse R — not two lengths simply added.

  • D2525, at θ=163.7°\theta = 163.7°

    R is right; the location has picked up an extra 90°, as if this were the sin-led form's rule ('maximum where the argument is 90°') rather than the cos-led one ('maximum where the argument is 0°'). For R cos(θ−α), the maximum is at θ = α exactly, with nothing added.

Traps tested: Phase shift ignored maximum assumed at zero · R computed as sum not pythagorean · Cos form location confused with sin form location

Question 34 marks

The equation 2cosθ+5sinθ=42\cos\theta + 5\sin\theta = 4 is to be solved for θ\theta in 0°θ<360°0° \leq \theta < 360°, after writing the left side as Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta - \alpha). Which statement about the solutions is correct?

  • There are exactly two solutions, because 4<R4 < R and cosine is two-to-one over a full period

    Correct. R=22+52=295.39R = \sqrt{2^2+5^2} = \sqrt{29} \approx 5.39, and 4<5.394 < 5.39, so cos(θα)=4290.743\cos(\theta-\alpha) = \frac{4}{\sqrt{29}} \approx 0.743 is a genuinely reachable value, strictly between −1 and 1 — which is exactly the condition for two solutions in one period.

  • BThere are no solutions, because 4 is not achievable — cos(θ−α) would need to exceed 1

    4R=4290.743\frac{4}{R} = \frac{4}{\sqrt{29}} \approx 0.743, which is comfortably below 1, not above it. The equation is achievable; the threshold to check is whether the constant on the right exceeds R, and 4 does not exceed √29 ≈ 5.39.

  • CThere is exactly one solution, because inverse cosine only returns one value

    That is a fact about the cos⁻¹ button, not about the equation. Cosine's two-to-one behaviour over a full period means a second solution always exists alongside the calculator's principal value whenever the target lies strictly between −R and R, as it does here.

  • DThere are infinitely many solutions, because the equation is periodic

    The underlying wave is periodic, but θ is restricted to one 360° interval here, which catches exactly one period's worth of solutions — two of them, not an unbounded number.

Traps tested: Solvability threshold misjudged · Only principal solution found · Periodicity treated as infinite within a bounded interval

Question 42 marks

For acosθ+bsinθa\cos\theta + b\sin\theta with a>0a > 0 and b<0b < 0, which form keeps R>0R > 0 and 0<α<90°0 < \alpha < 90°?

  • Rcos(θ+α)R\cos(\theta + \alpha)

    Correct. This expands to RcosθcosαRsinθsinαR\cos\theta\cos\alpha - R\sin\theta\sin\alpha, giving Rcosα=a>0R\cos\alpha = a > 0 and Rsinα=b>0R\sin\alpha = -b > 0 (since b<0b < 0) — both positive, so a first-quadrant α exists.

  • BRcos(θα)R\cos(\theta - \alpha)

    This form gives Rcosα=aR\cos\alpha = a and Rsinα=bR\sin\alpha = b. With b<0b < 0, that second value is negative, which no angle in (0°,90°)(0°, 90°) can produce — the default minus-form only works when both a and b are positive.

  • CRsin(θα)R\sin(\theta - \alpha)

    A sin-led form is the right family when it's the sinθ term that needs isolating for a later step, but switching to sin doesn't fix the sign problem on its own — the matching equations for THIS form would need checking exactly the same way, and simply picking 'sin' without checking is a choice made without the actual sign check.

  • DIt cannot be written in this form at all when bb is negative

    Every a cosθ + b sinθ has a harmonic form for any real, nonzero a and b — it's a question of choosing the RIGHT one of the four sign combinations, not of harmonic form being unavailable.

Traps tested: Sign of b ignored when choosing the form · Sin led form chosen without checking signs · Negative coefficient assumed to block harmonic form

Question 53 marks

In this question you must show all stages of your working. Solutions relying entirely on calculator technology are not acceptable. Express 3cosθ+4sinθ3\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta in the form Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta - \alpha) and hence solve 3cosθ+4sinθ=23\cos\theta + 4\sin\theta = 2 for 0°θ<360°0° \leq \theta < 360°.

Which response is certain to earn full marks under the printed instruction above?

  • R = 5, α = 53.1° shown via Rcosα=3R\cos\alpha = 3, Rsinα=4R\sin\alpha = 4, then cos(θ53.1°)=0.4\cos(\theta-53.1°) = 0.4 solved to give θ = 119.6° and θ = 346.7°, with every step shown

    Correct — the full method is visible: the matching equations, R and α derived from them, the substitution back into the equation, and both solutions extracted, exactly what the printed instruction is checking for.

  • Bθ = 119.6° and θ = 346.7°, produced directly from the calculator's equation solver, with no R, α, or intermediate working shown

    Correct final answers with no visible method. The printed instruction removes the usual benefit of the doubt entirely — the general marking guidance is explicit that answers without working may not gain full credit, and this question was flagged precisely to exclude this response.

  • CR = 5, α = 53.1° with working shown, then only θ = 119.6° given as 'the' solution

    Part (a)'s work is fine; the equation is only half-solved. cos(θ−α) = 0.4 has a second solution in the interval, and the mark for finding it is separate from the mark for finding the first one.

  • Dθ = 119.6° only, with the note 'calculator confirms no other solutions in range'

    This is the exact response the printed instruction was written to exclude — naming the calculator as the method for confirming a solution count makes explicit what the instruction disallows, and it is also mathematically wrong: a second solution does exist.

Traps tested: Answer without working · Missing second solution in range · Calculator cited as the method

Question 61 mark

In part (a) you meant to write α = 53.1° but transposed the digits and wrote 51.3°. Part (b) says 'hence' state the maximum value of g(θ)g(\theta) and where it occurs. What is the best thing to do?

  • Use your own 51.3° consistently in part (b): maximum 5 at θ = 51.3°, and carry on

    Correct. B marks marked 'ft' are awarded for correctly applying your own earlier value, right or wrong — a correct method applied consistently to a wrong number is still paid for, and abandoning the question forfeits marks the scheme was going to award regardless.

  • BLeave part (b) blank, since part (a) is wrong

    The most expensive response available. It converts a one-digit transposition into the loss of an entire part, when the follow-through marks in (b) were available without redoing anything.

  • CWrite θ = 53.1° in part (b) without correcting part (a), since that's the value you now suspect is right

    This leaves the script internally inconsistent — part (b) no longer follows from part (a), so there's no working for a follow-through mark to attach to. If (a) is suspected wrong, correct (a) itself and let (b) follow from the corrected value.

  • DCross out the whole question and restart it from part (a), whatever it costs in time

    Worth it only if spotted immediately with time to spare. As a default it's the wrong trade — the ft marks in (b) were free, and a 90-minute, 75-mark paper leaves little room to re-run a question already partly paid for.

Traps tested: Abandons the question after an error · Answer inconsistent with own working · Restarts instead of continuing

Question 73 marks

A real WMA13 question of this exact type (Oct 2020, Q7(a)) reads: 'Express cos x + 4 sin x in the form R cos(x − α) where R > 0 and 0 < α < π/2. Give the exact value of R and give the value of α, in radians, to 3 decimal places.' Its real mark scheme awards B1 for R = √17 with the note 'do not allow decimals for this mark', and states for α = awrt 1.326 that 'the degree equivalent α = awrt 75.96° is A0' — the same angle, in the wrong unit.

Applying that same real mark scheme's rules: 2cosθ+3sinθ2\cos\theta + 3\sin\theta is written as Rcos(θα)R\cos(\theta-\alpha), with R>0R>0 and 0<α<π20 < \alpha < \frac{\pi}{2}, and the question asks for the EXACT value of RR and the value of α\alpha in RADIANS to 3 decimal places. Which pair earns full marks?

  • R=13R = \sqrt{13}, α=0.983\alpha = 0.983

    Correct. R=22+32=13R = \sqrt{2^2+3^2} = \sqrt{13} — left exact, as asked — and tanα=32\tan\alpha = \frac{3}{2} gives α=0.983\alpha = 0.983 (3 d.p.) in radians, as asked. Both the form and the unit match what the question specified.

  • BR=3.606R = 3.606, α=0.983\alpha = 0.983

    R has been rounded to a decimal, and the question asked for the EXACT value. On the real question this trap is verified against, the mark scheme states plainly for R = √17: 'do not allow decimals for this mark' — a correct decimal, however precise, is not an acceptable substitute for the exact surd when the exact value was what was asked for.

  • CR=13R = \sqrt{13}, α=56.3°\alpha = 56.3°

    α has been given in degrees, and the question asked for radians. On the real question this trap is verified against, the mark scheme states for exactly this situation: 'the degree equivalent α = awrt 75.96° is A0' — the identical angle, correctly computed, earns nothing because it isn't in the unit the question specified.

  • DR=13R = 13, α=0.983\alpha = 0.983

    This is R2R^2, with the square root left off — R2=22+32=13R^2 = 2^2+3^2 = 13, so R=13R = \sqrt{13}, not 13 itself. The same slip as forgetting the square root anywhere else this identity is built.

Traps tested: R rounded to decimal when exact value required · Alpha given in degrees when radians specified · Forgot square root of a squared plus b squared

Practice this for real

This site teaches the mechanism; the exam is sat on Pearson's own real questions. Go find and attempt these yourself — nothing here substitutes for actually sitting a timed paper.

Question paper
Jan 2023 — cited directly in this lesson
Pearson's official past-papers portal

Select International Advanced Level → Mathematics → any series, then look for WMA13.

Pure Mathematics 3 · progress saved in this browser · sign in to sync across devices

Up next

eˣ, ln x, and Estimating Parameters from Logarithmic Graphs

\ln x is not a second function to learn — it is e^x walked backwards, and it exists at all only because e^x never repeats an output. The same "take logs and read off a straight line" move that solves one equation for x is also what turns a growth or decay curve of unknown shape into a line whose gradient and intercept hand you the model's own constants — which is why this topic is graded almost entirely on real-world modelling questions, and almost never on bare algebra for its own sake.

65 min